Abstract
Zooarchaeologists have long recognized that the use of different sizes of screen in excavation can result in varying degrees of bias in faunal samples. This paper presents a graphical, mathematical representation of the ways in which screen size choice can affect measures of taxonomic relative abundance. Data from the site of Mogollon Village in southwestern New Mexico show that the rank order of samples along a measure of relative abundance like the Artiodactyl Index can vary with screen size. This occurs because specimens of a given taxon can respond to changes in screen size in different ways in different provenience units, a fact which also severely limits the utility of “correction factor” methods for dealing with screen size bias. The model presented here and the Mogollon Village fauna have important implications for studies based on temporal or spatial trends in the abundances of large-bodied taxa relative to small-bodied taxa, especially in cases where large mesh sizes or no screens at all were used in excavation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
