Abstract

AbstractPrecise control of ultrasonic acoustic waves with frequencies f ≳ 20 kHz is useful in a range of applications from ultrasonic scanners to nondestructive testing and consumer haptic devices. A spatial sound modulator (SSM) is the acoustic analogy to the spatial light modulator (SLM) in optics and is highly sought after by acoustics researchers. A spatial sound modulator is constrained by very distinct practical conditions. Namely, it must be a reconfigurable device which modulates sound arbitrarily from a decoupled source. Here a reflective phase modulating device is realized, whose local units can be tuned to imprint a phase signature to an incoming wave. It is manually reconfigurable and consists of 1024 rigidly ended square waveguides with sliding bottom surfaces to provide variable phase delays. Experiments demonstrate the ability of this device to focus ultrasonic waves in air at different points in space, generate accurate pressure landscapes, and perform multiplane holography. Moreover, thanks to the subwavelength nature of the unit cells, this device outperforms state‐of‐the‐art phased‐array transducers of the same size in the quality and energy distribution of generated acoustic holographic images. These results pave the way for the construction of electronically controlled reflective SSMs.

Highlights

  • By tuning the relative phase and amplitude useful in a range of applications from ultrasonic scanners to nondestructive testing and consumer haptic devices

  • pararray transducers (PATs) are bigger than the wavelength of the wave they generate,[10,11,12,13,14,15] which poses severe limitations to the accuracy of the acoustic landscapes they can produce

  • We develop a manually reconfigurable reflective spatial sound modulator (SSM) and demonstrate an important step toward the construction of a true acoustic analog for spatial light modulator (SLM)

Read more

Summary

Propagating Acoustic field MSESSM distance

This device was reconfigured to produce a simple holographic image (compare simulation and measurement in Figure 3i,j, respectively) even though, in this case, the complexity of the pressure landscape was greatly limited by its smaller number of elements. More details are given in the Supporting Information. a,b,i) All the simulations show normalized pressures (|P|/Pmax)

Propagating Acoustic field distance
Conflict of Interest
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call