Abstract

The Yugoslav government’s position and methods regarding the northern border changed multiple times due to the changes in the political situation of the great powers and in the situation of Hungary. The peace delegation of the South Slavic state allegedly wanted the major powers to accept the northern borders of the newly established state based on ethnic principle. However, the delegation effectively supported these claims with strategic, economic and sometimes even historical arguments. Belgrade’s attitude toward Hungary at the Paris Peace Conference was basically determined by the fact that, at the beginning of 1919, its territorial claims against Hungary were essentially mere corrections to the demarcation line established at the Belgrade Military Convention. The fact, that by then, the South Slavic state was effectively already in possession of the territories it wanted to attain, also carried signifi cant importance. Thus, they only expected the sanctioning of the situation from the Peace Conference. Despite the fact that the Trianon Peace Treaty clearly designated the territories that remained under the control of Hungary, the Yugoslav occupation of the region consisted of Baranya county and the Northern parts of the Bachka was prolonged until August 1921.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.