Abstract

In recent times Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is picking up its force quicker than at any other time. Distinguishing autism characteristics through screening tests is over the top expensive and tedious. Screening of the same is a challenging task, and classification must be conducted with great care. Machine Learning (ML) can perform great in the classification of this problem. Most researchers have utilized the ML strategy to characterize patients and typical controls, among which support vector machines (SVM) are broadly utilized. Even though several studies have been done utilizing various methods, these investigations didn't give any complete decision about anticipating autism qualities regarding distinctive age groups. Accordingly, this paper plans to locate the best technique for ASD classi-fication out of SVM, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Naïve Bayes (NB), Stochastic gradient descent (SGD), Adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), and CN2 Rule Induction using 4 ASD datasets taken from UCI ML repository. The classification accuracy (CA) we acquired after experimentation is as follows: in the case of the adult dataset SGD gives 99.7%, in the adolescent dataset RF gives 97.2%, in the child dataset SGD gives 99.6%, in the toddler dataset Ada-Boost gives 99.8%. Autism spectrum quotients (AQs) varied among several sce-narios for toddlers, adults, adolescents, and children that include positive predic-tive value for the scaling purpose. AQ questions referred to topics about attention to detail, attention switching, communication, imagination, and social skills.

Highlights

  • The autism spectrum disorder (ASD) screening process differs according to age

  • The data depend on the autism diagnostic observation schedule (ADOS) & autism diagnostic interview (ADI), which is conducted in a clinical setting

  • The data available in the UCI repository were obtained for our work and collected with the help of a mobile application developed to perform four ASD screening methods, namely, the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ) of Adult, Adolescent, Child, and Toddler

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The autism spectrum disorder (ASD) screening process differs according to age. Two global classification systems for ASD diagnosis, namely, the Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM-5), which is provided by the American Psychiatric Association and considers the condition as a single diagnosis by removing subgroups, and the International Classification of Disease (ICD-11), created by the World Health Organization (WHO). According to the DSM, autism and intellectual disability occur concurrently. The ICD provides a detailed guide to distinguish autism prevailing with and without an intellectual disability; it considers historical data on loss of previous skill in the diagnostic process. The most difficult aspect of diagnosing ASD is that no single pathognomonic feature exists and all symptoms revolve around the modification of an individual’s behavioral profile, which varies according to age and severity. Automation based on the diagnostic perspective must be fine-tuned

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.