Abstract

ObjectivesProposing a machine learning model to predict readers’ performances, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and lesion sensitivity, using the readers’ characteristics.MethodsData were collected from 905 radiologists and breast physicians who completed at least one case-set of 60 mammographic images containing 40 normal and 20 biopsy-proven cancer cases. Nine different case-sets were available. Using a questionnaire, we collected radiologists’ demographic details, such as reading volume and years of experience. These characteristics along with a case set difficulty measure were fed into two ensemble of regression trees to predict the readers’ AUCs and lesion sensitivities. We calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient between the predicted values by the model and the actual AUC and lesion sensitivity. The usefulness of the model to categorize readers as low and high performers based on different criteria was also evaluated. The performances of the models were evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation.ResultsThe Pearson correlation coefficient between the predicted AUC and actual one was 0.60 (p < 0.001). The model’s performance for differentiating the reader in the first and fourth quartile based on the AUC values was 0.86 (95% CI 0.83–0.89). The model reached an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.88–0.93) for distinguishing the readers in the first quartile from the fourth one based on the lesion sensitivity.ConclusionA machine learning model can be used to categorize readers as high- or low-performing. Such model could be useful for screening programs for designing a targeted quality assurance and optimizing the double reading practice.

Highlights

  • To improve the quality of screening mammography programs, guidelines have proposed criteria based on the reader characteristics for certification to undertake independent mammography interpretation [1, 2]

  • The reader’s age, number of years reading mammograms (# Years 1), and number of years certified as screening readers (# Years 2) were discretized in four quartiles

  • This paper investigated how the readers' characteristics affect the performance of readers, using a very large dataset collected from 905 radiologists and breast physicians

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To improve the quality of screening mammography programs, guidelines have proposed criteria based on the reader characteristics for certification to undertake independent mammography interpretation [1, 2] These guidelines mostly use annual mammographic reading volume as a criterion for certification, there are discrepancies between countries in the volume read required for certification. Improving understanding about the relationship between readers’ characteristics and mammography interpretation performances could be used to inform targeted quality assurance and surveillance measures for readers, for those at high risk of under-performing. Such programs might improve the performance of the screening program [19]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call