Abstract

Background and Objective: Primary lung cancer is a lethal and rapidly-developing cancer type and is one of the most leading causes of cancer deaths. Materials and Methods: Statistical methods such as Cox regression are usually used to detect the prognosis factors of a disease. This study investigated survival prediction using machine learning algorithms. The clinical data of 28,458 patients with primary lung cancers were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results: This study indicated that the survival rate of women with primary lung cancer was often higher than that of men (p < 0.001). Seven popular machine learning algorithms were utilized to evaluate one-year, three-year, and five-year survival prediction The two classifiers extreme gradient boosting (XGB) and logistic regression (LR) achieved the best prediction accuracies. The importance variable of the trained XGB models suggested that surgical removal (feature “Surgery”) made the largest contribution to the one-year survival prediction models, while the metastatic status (feature “N” stage) of the regional lymph nodes was the most important contributor to three-year and five-year survival prediction. The female patients’ three-year prognosis model achieved a prediction accuracy of 0.8297 on the independent future samples, while the male model only achieved the accuracy 0.7329. Conclusions: This data suggested that male patients may have more complicated factors in lung cancer than females, and it is necessary to develop gender-specific diagnosis and prognosis models.

Highlights

  • Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths, and it is estimated to have caused 142,670 deaths in 2019 alone [1]

  • We used the log-rank test to measure the difference in survival rates between female and male patients with primary lung cancer (p < 0.001)

  • The prognosis analysis in this study suggested that female lung cancer patients had a better prognosis than male patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths, and it is estimated to have caused 142,670 deaths in 2019 alone [1]. Zang et al suggested that the gender variation cannot be explained by the differences in the factors of baseline exposure, smoking history, or body size, but may be caused by the higher susceptibility to tobacco carcinogens in females [10]. Another study suggested that females have a better survival rate than males after considering confounders like smoking [13]. Many studies observed the gender differences in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB), where males had a higher incidence of UCB, but females tended to have worse outcomes [14]. Results: This study indicated that the survival rate of women with primary lung cancer was often higher than that of men (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This data suggested that male patients may have more complicated factors in lung cancer than females, and it is necessary to develop gender-specific diagnosis and prognosis models

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call