Abstract

In this study, nine different statistical models are constructed using different combinations of predictors, including models with and without projected predictors. Multiple machine learning (ML) techniques are employed to optimize the ensemble predictions by selecting the top performing ensemble members and determining the weights for each ensemble member. The ML-Optimized Ensemble (ML-OE) forecasts are evaluated against the Simple-Averaging Ensemble (SAE) forecasts. The results show that for the response variables that are predicted with significant skill by individual ensemble members and SAE, such as Atlantic tropical cyclone counts, the performance of SAE is comparable to the best ML-OE results. However, for response variables that are poorly modeled by individual ensemble members, such as Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico major hurricane counts, ML-OE predictions often show higher skill score than individual model forecasts and the SAE predictions. However, neither SAE nor ML-OE was able to improve the forecasts of the response variables when all models show consistent bias. The results also show that increasing the number of ensemble members does not necessarily lead to better ensemble forecasts. The best ensemble forecasts are from the optimally combined subset of models.

Highlights

  • Tropical cyclones (TC), known as hurricanes in the Atlantic Ocean and Eastern Pacific, are extreme weather systems on Earth that have far reaching adverse impacts on the human society [1,2] and are the costliest natural disasters in the United States [3]

  • The results show that increasing the number of ensemble members does not necessarily lead to better ensemble forecasts

  • The machine learning (ML)-Optimized Ensemble (ML-OE) forecasts are evaluated against the benchmark of Simple-Averaging Ensemble (SAE) forecasts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tropical cyclones (TC), known as hurricanes in the Atlantic Ocean and Eastern Pacific, are extreme weather systems on Earth that have far reaching adverse impacts on the human society [1,2] and are the costliest natural disasters in the United States [3]. Governmental agencies and nongovernmental organizations dealing with TC disaster preparedness planning and post-disaster humanitarian relief efforts, and industries dealing with the potential impacts from TCs rely on skillful seasonal predictions of TC activities for their preseason decisions. Findings from several studies showed that the skills of preseason forecasts issued by various groups were marginal [15,16,17]. There is a clear gap between the current skills of preseason TC forecasts and the public demand for such information. When such technological gap is bridged, the potential economic values of seasonal hurricane prediction can be fully realized [18]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call