Abstract

Vicarious trial and error behaviors (VTEs) indicate periods of indecision during decision-making, and have been proposed as a behavioral marker of deliberation. In order to understand the neural underpinnings of these putative bridges between behavior and neural dynamics, researchers need the ability to readily distinguish VTEs from non-VTEs. Here we utilize a small set of trajectory-based features and standard machine learning classifiers to identify VTEs from non-VTEs for rats performing a spatial delayed alternation task (SDA) on an elevated plus maze. We also show that previously reported features of the hippocampal field potential oscillation can be used in the same types of classifiers to separate VTEs from non-VTEs with above chance performance. However, we caution that the modest classifier success using hippocampal population dynamics does not identify many trials where VTEs occur, and show that combining oscillation-based features with trajectory-based features does not improve classifier performance compared to trajectory-based features alone. Overall, we propose a standard set of features useful for trajectory-based VTE classification in binary decision tasks, and support previous suggestions that VTEs are supported by a network including, but likely extending beyond, the hippocampus.

Highlights

  • Introduced and popularized in the 1930s, vicarious trial and error (VTE) is a well documented behavioral phenomenon where subjects vacillate between reward options before settling on their final choice (Muenzinger and Gentry, 1931; Tolman, 1938)

  • We show that VTE behavior can be robustly and reliably separated from nonVTE behavior using a small set of trajectory-based features

  • We show that classifiers trained on features of the dorsal HPC field potential oscillation separate VTEs from non-VTEs more than would be expected by chance, supporting previous research linking the HPC to VTEs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Introduced and popularized in the 1930s, vicarious trial and error (VTE) is a well documented behavioral phenomenon where subjects vacillate between reward options before settling on their final choice (Muenzinger and Gentry, 1931; Tolman, 1938). Current theories claim that subjects mentally assess possible options before making a final decision during VTEs (Redish, 2016), suggesting that they may be related to, but not necessarily identical to, an underlying deliberative process. While such a relationship to deliberation is complex and outside of the scope of this paper, it is clear that VTEs are a valuable behavioral variable to take into account when studying decision-making, when investigating neural processing during decisions.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call