Abstract
Abstract The value of true belief has played a central role in history of philosophy – consider Socrates’ slogan that the unexamined life is not worth living, and Aristotle’s claim that everyone naturally wants knowledge – as well as in contemporary epistemology, where questions about the value of knowledge have recently taken center stage. It has usually been assumed that accurate representation – true belief – is valuable, either instrumentally or for its own sake. This book is a critical study of that assumption, and of the main ways in which it can be defended. It is argued that true belief is at most sometimes valuable. In the first part of the book, the view that true belief is normally better for us than false belief is targeted, and it is argued that false beliefs about ourselves – for example, unrealistic optimism about our futures – and about other people – for example, overly positive views of our friends – are often valuable vis-à-vis our wellbeing. In the second part, the view that truth is the “aim of belief” is targeted, and anti-realism about the epistemic value of true belief is defended. Together, these arguments comprise a challenge to the philosophical assumption of the value of true belief, and suggest an alternative picture, on which the fact that some people love of truth is all there is to the “value of true belief.”
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.