Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate the image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio, and radiation dose at indirect multidetector-row computed tomographic venography (CTV) using a low-kilovolt (peak) (kV[p]) high-tube current technique. Thirty patients underwent indirect CTV of the lower extremity at 120 kV(p) with 170 mA and at 80 kV(p) with 426 mA (CT dose index volumes 11.8 and 9.0 mGy, respectively) on a 64-detector CT scanner. We assessed CT numbers, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio of deep (femoral and popliteal) veins. The mean (SD) CT numbers of the femoral and popliteal veins were significantly greater at 80 kV(p) than at 120 kV(p) (142.8 [24.5] and 147.0 [19.4] Hounsfield units [HU], respectively, vs 93.1 [15.5] and 105.0 [14.9] HU, respectively; P < 0.01). The mean (SD) image noise was significantly higher at 80 kV(p) than at 120 kV(p) (11.6 [2.6] and 7.4 [1.4] HU, respectively, vs 8.9 [1.6] and 6.2 [1.5] HU, respectively; P < 0.01). Contrast-to-noise ratios at the femoral and popliteal veins were significantly higher at 80 kV(p) than at 120 kV(p) (6.0 [2.2] and 9.7 [2.4], respectively vs 3.3 [1.8] and 6.9 [2.5], respectively; P < 0.01). At indirect CTV, 80 kV(p) and a high tube current setting yielded significantly improved image quality at a reduced radiation dose compared with 120 kV(p).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.