Abstract
Alkali-activated slag and fly ash (AASF) materials are emerging as promising alternatives to conventional Portland cement. Despite the superior mechanical properties of AASF materials, they are known to show large autogenous shrinkage, which hinders the wide application of these eco-friendly materials in infrastructure. To mitigate the autogenous shrinkage of AASF, two innovative autogenous-shrinkage-mitigating admixtures, superabsorbent polymers (SAPs) and metakaolin (MK), are applied in this study. The results show that the incorporation of SAPs and MK significantly mitigates autogenous shrinkage and cracking potential of AASF paste and concrete. Moreover, the AASF concrete with SAPs and MK shows enhanced workability and tensile strength-to-compressive strength ratios. These results indicate that SAPs and MK are promising admixtures to make AASF concrete a high-performance alternative to Portland cement concrete in structural engineering.
Highlights
An important way to reduce the CO2 emissions from the construction sector is to use “greener”alternative binders to ordinary Portland cement (OPC)
The literature has illustrated that alkali-activated slag and fly ash (AASF) shows superior strength, excellent durability and good fire resistance compared to OPC systems [2,3,4]
The autogenous shrinkage of AASF paste reached more than 2000 μm/m at 1 day and around 4000 μm/m at the age of 7 days
Summary
An important way to reduce the CO2 emissions from the construction sector is to use “greener”alternative binders to ordinary Portland cement (OPC). Alkali-activated materials (AAMs), or so-called geopolymers, which can be made of industrial by-products, have been reported to entail much lower. CO2 emission and embodied energy than OPC systems [1]. AAMs. The literature has illustrated that alkali-activated slag and fly ash (AASF) shows superior strength, excellent durability and good fire resistance compared to OPC systems [2,3,4]. A number of studies have been conducted to reduce the shrinkage of AASF. It has been found that the shrinkage-reducing agents and expansive additives that are widely adopted in OPC may be ineffective or cause side effects (e.g., strength loss) in AAMs due to the differences in microstructures and chemical environments between AAMs and OPC [7,8].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
