Abstract

This article discusses about the effects of public school education on ethnic group distribution in Taiwan during the Japanese colonial period, with Changhua Plain in central Taiwan as an example. Many Han Chinese migrated to Taiwan from various coastal areas in Southeast China under the rule of Qing dynasty (1684-1895). The different ethnic groups were distributed in such a way that populations from the same ancestral home lived together while those of different descent became segregated. Transitioning into the Japanese colonial period in 1895, did the promotion of Japanese education assimilate different ancestral ethnic groups in Taiwan and change their distribution on the island? To answer this question, this article starts by organizing the 1901 and 1926 distribution of ancestral ethnic groups across 27 Changhua Plain areas in central Taiwan, as well as quantifying the levels of ethnic group distribution by the Gini coefficient. This is followed by applying difference-in-differences estimation to examine the effects of Japanese public school education on ancestral ethnic group distribution.

Highlights

  • Many Han Chinese migrated to Taiwan from southeast China coast during the Qing rule period

  • This article discusses about the effects of public school education on ethnic group distribution in Taiwan during the Japanese colonial period, with Changhua Plain in central Taiwan as an example

  • We focus on Changhua Plain in central Taiwan as the geographic range, which encompasses the area of present-day Changhua County for geographic considerations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many Han Chinese migrated to Taiwan from southeast China coast during the Qing rule period. In districts where public schools were not established, Yuanlin Street showed a centralized distribution and Tianwei Village showed a dispersed distribution Under such circumstances, did Japanese public school education during the Japanese colonial period “assimilate” different ancestral ethnic groups in Taiwan and change their distribution by altering the Han Chinese’s unique clustering behaviors that had been formed since the Qing dynasty? We will employ the difference-in-differences approach in discussing the above question

Difference-in-Differences Estimation
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call