Abstract

The subject matter of this research is Kant’s apriorism underlying Hilbert’s formalism in the philosophical grounding of mathematics as a self-sufficing system. The research aim is the invention of such a logically formalized axiomatic epistemology system, in which it is possible to construct formal deductive inferences of formulae—modeling the formalism ideal of Hilbert—from the assumption of Kant’s apriorism in relation to mathematical knowledge. The research method is hypothetical–deductive (axiomatic). The research results and their scientific novelty are based on a logically formalized axiomatic system of epistemology called Σ + C, constructed here for the first time. In comparison with the already published formal epistemology systems Ξ and Σ, some of the axiom schemes here are generalized in Σ + C, and a new symbol is included in the object-language alphabet of Σ + C, namely, the symbol representing the perfection modality, C: “it is consistent that…”. The meaning of this modality is defined by the system of axiom schemes of Σ + C. A deductive proof of the consistency of Σ + C is submitted. For the first time, by means of Σ + C, it is deductively demonstrated that, from the conjunction of Σ + C and either the first or second version of Gödel’s theorem of incompleteness of a formal arithmetic system, the formal arithmetic investigated by Gödel is a representation of an empirical knowledge system. Thus, Kant’s view of mathematics as a self-sufficient, pure, a priori knowledge system is falsified.

Highlights

  • Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral “Before all, be it observed, that proper mathematical propositions are always judgements a priori, and not empirical, because they carry along with them the conception of necessity, which cannot be given by experience”.with regard to jurisdictional claims inI

  • The present paper aims at recognizing and explicating the reason of/for Hilbert’s creation of the formalism program, and at giving an exact definition of the realm of the program’s soundness, which is missed by the aforementioned papers

  • Σ + C is a result of developing the formal axiomatic epistemological theory Ξ [27] and the formal axiomatic epistemological and axiological theory Σ [11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral “Before all, be it observed, that proper mathematical propositions are always judgements a priori, and not empirical, because they carry along with them the conception of necessity, which cannot be given by experience”. Published: 5 August 2021 published maps and institutional affiliations. “The denial of deflationism leads us to a difference in the concepts of truth and proof. For the strict formalist, truth and proof are equivalent concepts:

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call