Abstract

It has been well recognized that common-sense reasoning is nonmonotonic. Nonmonotonic reasoning is prototypically described by the reasoning about normality and exception. In this paper, we firstly propose a modal logic about normality and exception. We then present a nonmonotonic modal logic which formalizes the intuitions of nonmonotonic reasoning directly, rather than go around to indirect criterion. The results can be seen by comparing our logic with major nonmonotonic logics in recent literature. In particular, we provide a first-order extension of default logic and autoepistemic logic, and the capability of circumscription to infer universal statement. As a result, the relations among various existing nonmonotonic logics coincide in our logic. >

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.