Abstract
Legal philosophers seem to be pursued by a new plague: the notion of narrative coherence as a foundation of legal reasoning. Reflection on this notion has caused a considerable amount of controversy among legal philosophers. This article aims to be a linguistic (discourse-analytical) contribution to the discussion. It will attempt to reflect on the notion of narrative coherence from a relatively external point of view — theoretically less loaded by philosophical constraints.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
