Abstract

Recently, it has been suggested that effective interactions between two neuronal populations are supported by the phase difference between the oscillations in these two populations, a hypothesis referred to as “communication through coherence” (CTC). Experimental work quantified effective interactions by means of the power correlations between the two populations, where power was calculated on the local field potential and/or multi-unit activity. Here, we present a linear model of interacting oscillators that accounts for the phase dependency of the power correlation between the two populations and that can be used as a reference for detecting non-linearities such as gain control. In the experimental analysis, trials were sorted according to the coupled phase difference of the oscillators while the putative interaction between oscillations was taking place. Taking advantage of the modeling, we further studied the dependency of the power correlation on the uncoupled phase difference, connection strength, and topology. Since the uncoupled phase difference, i.e., the phase relation before the effective interaction, is the causal variable in the CTC hypothesis we also describe how power correlations depend on that variable. For uni-directional connectivity we observe that the width of the uncoupled phase dependency is broader than for the coupled phase. Furthermore, the analytical results show that the characteristics of the phase dependency change when a bidirectional connection is assumed. The width of the phase dependency indicates which oscillation frequencies are optimal for a given connection delay distribution. We propose that a certain width enables a stimulus-contrast dependent extent of effective long-range lateral connections.

Highlights

  • Different situations may require different aspects of knowledge stored in the brain (Dayan et al, 2000)

  • Using results from the analytical study, we predict that the width of the phase dependency will be different for the uncoupled and the coupled phase difference

  • Using numerical simulations we examine if the power correlation lags the phase difference, i.e., if the phase difference plays a causal role in determining the power correlation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Different situations may require different aspects of knowledge stored in the brain (Dayan et al, 2000). This theory has been very influential because it confirms a role for oscillations in the neuronal code (Buschman and Miller, 2007; Knight, 2007; Saalmann et al, 2007; Womelsdorf and Fries, 2008; Fries, 2009; Tiesinga and Sejnowski, 2009; Hipp et al, 2011; Singer, 2011) It has been tested experimentally by means of the phase difference between the multi-unit activity (MUA) from two recorded units, or between the MUA and the local field potential (LFP; Womelsdorf et al, 2007). For those trials that had a phase difference similar to the mean phase difference (“good phase”) oscillation amplitudes were more strongly correlated than for those trials that had a phase difference not corresponding to the mean (“bad phase”)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.