Abstract
To define the formal semantics of a modeling language, one normally starts from the abstract syntax and then defines the static semantics and dynamic semantics. Having a formal semantics is important for reasoning about the language but also for building tools for the language. In this paper we propose a novel approach for this task based on the Alloy language. With the help of a concrete example language, we contrast this approach with traditional methods based on formal languages, type checking, meta-modeling and operational semantics. Although both Alloy and traditional techniques yield a formal semantics of the language, the Alloy-based approach has two key advantages: a uniform notation, and immediate automatic analyzability using the Alloy analyzer. Together with the simplicity of Alloy, our approach offers the prospect of making formal definitions easier, hopefully paving the way for a wider adoption of formal techniques in the definition of modeling languages.KeywordsModeling LanguageOperational SemanticFormal SemanticAlloy ModelAbstract SyntaxThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.