Abstract
The theme freedom of chair is not new. It has long been discussed in combination with wider themes such as the right to information, the autonomy of universities and even the free expression of thought, a genre of which it is a species. And there were many clashes, including the censorship imposed by the civil-military dictatorship initiated in 1964 and surrounding legislative initiatives by political agents of a conservative hue in an attempt to promote themes permeated with ideological biases such as the “agenda of customs”. Contextualizing these two time frames and the discussions arising from the results brought by jurisprudential research, we provide an overview of what is being debated regarding the academic freedom before the Supreme Court, which may indicate which points still remain in dispute. The exploratory bibliographic review made it possible to establish concepts about public freedoms in general and, above all, the specificity of academic freedom. From then on, empirical research was carried out on the jurisprudential collection of the Federal Supreme Court, analyzing quantitatively and qualitatively the results obtained, consisting of rulings and monocratic decisions, identifying correlated subjects and making it possible to observe that the field of Education, of which the Freedom of professorship is a specific aspect, it remains a field of ideological and legal dispute.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
