Abstract
Professor Robert Hay rebuts the editorial judgment of John Alderson's research report in the Spring issue of the Journal and in his turn questions the editor's understanding of an effective letter. George Douglas then clarifies his earlier statements and reiterates some of his criticisms.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
