Abstract
ABSTRACTThe court of inquiry into the collision between the submarine Greeneville and the motor vessel Ehime Maru focused on human performance and functioning of equipment at the time of the accident. This commentary addresses whether alternative equipment, particularly equipment addressing communication and interpretation issues, would have made a difference. It also looks at whether generalized equipment of this nature would be of benefit in other hi‐tempo scenarios that could be anticipated in the future.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
