Abstract
Design configurations, such as Bills of Materials (BoMs), are indispensable parts of any product development process and integral to the design descriptions stored in proprietary Computer Aided Design and Product Lifecycle Management systems. Engineers use BoMs and other design configurations as lenses to repurpose design descriptions for specific purposes. For this reason, multiple BoMs typically occur in any given product development process. For example, an engineering BoM may be used to define a configuration that best supports a design activity whereas a manufacturing BoM may be used to define the configuration of parts that best supports a manufacturing process. Current practice for the definition of BoMs involves the use of indented parts lists and dendograms that are prone to error because it is easy to create discrepancies across BoMs that, in essence, are defined through collections of part identifiers such as names and part numbers. Such errors have a significant detrimental effect on the performance of product development processes by creating the need for rework, adding costs and increasing time to market.This paper introduces a design description capability that ensures consistency across BoMs for a given design. A boolean hypercube lattice is used to define a design configuration space that includes all possible configurations for a given design description. Valid operations within the space are governed by the mathematics of hypercube lattices. The design description capability is demonstrated through an early engineering design configuration software tool that offers significant benefits by ensuring consistency across the BoMs for a given design. The software uses and generates design descriptions that are exported from and imported to commercially available design systems through a standard (ISO 10303-214) interface format. In this way, potential for early impact on industry practice is high.
Highlights
The success of today's global supply networks depends on the efficient and effective communication of design descriptions that suit the requirements and capabilities of the wide range of engineering functions, processes and suppliers involved in the delivery of products to markets
They are fundamental to engineering design and development processes because they act as integrators: adapting detailed design descriptions to suit the needs of particular engineering processes
This paper proposes a novel approach to ensuring the referential integrity of Bills of Materials (BoMs) in technical data packages
Summary
The success of today's global supply networks depends on the efficient and effective communication of design descriptions (including design intent and shape definitions) that suit the requirements and capabilities of the wide range of engineering functions, processes and suppliers involved in the delivery of products to markets. At a recent industry summit [1], a representative of Boeing noted that some 40% of the technical data needed to create a product resides outside the shape definitions in the technical product data package This non-shape data includes design requirements, functional descriptions of the product, design configurations, manufacturing information and process-related information such as change histories and design approvals. The paper reports a feasibility study which used a simplified robot case study (in Section 5) to illustrate an exploration of whether embedding can be used to allow multiple BoMs to be superimposed on each other If successful this has the potential to reduce data duplication in design descriptions, provide improvement opportunities for the management of change and allow new BoMs to be defined as and when needed through the entire product lifecycle.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
