Abstract

In this paper, we introduce an efficient sparse Gaussian process (E-SGP) for the surrogate modelling of fluid mechanics. This novel Bayesian machine learning algorithm enables efficient model training using databases of different structures. It extends the approximated sparse GP algorithm by combining the concept of efficient GP (E-GP) and variational energy free sparse Gaussian processes (VEF-SGP). The developed E-SGP approach leverages the arbitrariness of inducing points and the monotonically increasing nature of the objective function with respect to the number of inducing points in VEF-SGP. By specifying the inducing points on the orthogonal grid/input subspace and using the Kronecker product, E-SGP significantly enhances computational efficiency without imposing constraints on the covariance matrix or increasing the number of parameters that need to be optimised during training.The E-SGP algorithm outperforms E-GP not only in terms of scalability but also in model quality, as evidenced by mean standardised logarithmic loss (MSLL). The computational complexity of E-GP grows cubically with an increasing structured training database, while E-SGP maintains computational efficiency as the model resolution (i.e., the number of inducing points) remains the same. The examples show that E-SGP produces more accurate predictions compared to E-GP when model resolutions are similar. In the application to a partially structured database, E-GP benefits from more training data but comes with higher computational demands, while E-SGP achieves a comparable level of accuracy but is more computationally efficient, making E-SGP a potentially preferable choice for fluid mechanics. Furthermore, E-SGP can produce more reasonable estimates of model uncertainty, whilst E-GP is more likely to produce over-confident predictions. In the application to partially structured databases, the performance of E-SGP is also compared to the structured Gaussian processes latent variable model (SGPLVM). In this case, E-SGP and SGPLVM both exhibit robust performance. However, E-SGP demonstrates a slight advantage over SGPLVM, particularly in terms of MSLL, indicating that E-SGP is better at producing trustworthy and accurate estimates of the uncertainty in the predictions. . While SGPLVM also improves computational efficiency by exploiting the Kronecker product and a small number of inducing points, E-SGP's orthogonal grid specification of inducing points further enhances its scalability and robustness, making it a superior choice for complex fluid mechanics problems with partially structured data.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.