Abstract

One of the most cumbersome and time-demanding tasks in completing a protein model is building short missing regions or ;loops'. A method is presented that uses structural and electron-density information to build the most likely conformations of such loops. Using the distribution of angles and dihedral angles in pentapeptides as the driving parameters, a set of possible conformations for the C(alpha) backbone of loops was generated. The most likely candidate is then selected in a hierarchical manner: new and stronger restraints are added while the loop is built. The weight of the electron-density correlation relative to geometrical considerations is gradually increased until the most likely loop is selected on map correlation alone. To conclude, the loop is refined against the electron density in real space. This is started by using structural information to trace a set of models for the C(alpha) backbone of the loop. Only in later steps of the algorithm is the electron-density correlation used as a criterion to select the loop(s). Thus, this method is more robust in low-density regions than an approach using density as a primary criterion. The algorithm is implemented in a loop-building program, Loopy, which can be used either alone or as part of an automatic building cycle. Loopy can build loops of up to 14 residues in length within a couple of minutes. The average root-mean-square deviation of the C(alpha) atoms in the loops built during validation was less than 0.4 A. When implemented in the context of automated model building in ARP/wARP, Loopy can increase the completeness of the built models.

Highlights

  • In macromolecular X-ray crystallography, building a complete model from a density map remains a challenging task

  • We wanted to validate Loopy: could the program rebuild parts of a model using the best available map? In the stage, we considered a more interesting question: can Loopy build loops in difficult parts of the density map? In other words, could Loopy add to the model completion by building loops where another program, in this case ARP/ wARP, failed? All these tests will be described in the subsections

  • We firstly show the results after running the main-chain and side-chain building modules of ARP/ wARP alone (C, chains; r, correct residues) and we indicate the same numbers after running Loopy [C(L), r(L)]; t, time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In macromolecular X-ray crystallography, building a complete model from a density map remains a challenging task. Even though several programs exist that aim towards automated model building [for example, ARP/wARP (Perrakis et al, 1999), RESOLVE (Terwilliger, 2003a), TEXTAL (Ioerger et al, 1999), MAID (Levitt, 2001) and Buccaneer (Cowtan, 2006)], none of these programs is expected to return a ‘complete’ model. This means that no matter how far the automated model building has progressed, part of the model still needs to be built manually.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call