Abstract
The Special Jurisdiction for Peace (SJP) integrates a prior dialogic procedure in its institutional arrangement. This procedure aims to facilitate interactions between participants and victims to enhance contributions to the truth. This procedure faces problems that hinder the guarantee of victims' rights, conflicting with the principle of centrality of the victims. In this framework, we propose a mnemonic justice model as an ethical and procedural minimum at this stage of the process. This model can offer the participants tools to address to the needs of the victims in an effective manner.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
