Abstract

Remittance inflows have been a key stimulus to economic growth of many developing countries. There is scant literature available on the impact of remittance inflows and outflows on the economic growth of the large developed countries. For instance, there is little literature on the impact of remittance inflows and outflows on the economic growth rate of Japan. Hence this research objective of this paper is to investigate the relationship between ‘remittance inflows’ and ‘outflows’ on the ‘economic growth rate’ of Japan. The paper by utilizing the World Bank data set and the econometric model namely the Granger Causality Model to test and analysis the impact of remittance inflows and outflows on the economic growth rate of Japan. The findings show that in the long run, a 1% increase in remittance outflows will decrease GDP growth rate by 0.000793%. In the short run, a 1% increase in remittance outflows and inflows will decrease GDP growth rate by 0.000599% and 0.000327% respectively. The Japanese government should encourage retired Japanese workers to return to the labour market and effectively contribute to the workforce and retired workers can be re-trained so that less foreign migrant workers are needed and this will reduce remittance outflow.

Highlights

  • There are a number of benefits of remittance inflows to both developed and developing countries

  • This study found that there exist a significant long run positive association between economic growth and remittances in Korea; for China a significant negative association existed between economic growth and remittances

  • The main aim of this study was to investigate the impact of remittance inflows and outflows on the economic growth rate of Japan

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There are a number of benefits of remittance inflows to both developed and developing countries. As of year 2015, the GDP per capita of China was US$8027.70 while the GDP per capita of Japan was US$32,477.2 (World Bank 2017) This implies that residents of China have much less per capita income to spend on consumption as compared to the residents of Japan. As a result of this, the residents of China may migrate to Japan in order to send their earned income from Japan to their families in China. These types of transfers are classified as remittances (World Bank 2017). Skilled migration generates remittances and it is economically viable for the developing countries to train skilled workers for export (Goldfarb et al 1984). Cash sent by employees working in the developed countries to their relatives in the developing countries has turned out to be the second largest form of inflows and is next to foreign direct investment (Aggrawal et al 2011)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.