Abstract
The article addresses the wording of the sole paragraph of article 1.085 of the Civil Code provided by the Law nº 13.792/19, by which it is no longer necessary to have a meeting for the minority shareholder to perform its right of defense in the case of exclusion for just cause in limited liability companies formed by two shareholders. The new wording raises significant controversy around the rule. After all, to the minority shareholder the possibility of putting forward your defense in front of the major shareholder is no longer guaranteed, in an apparent affront to the rights of defense and to adversarial proceedings provided for in article 5th, LV, of the Federal Constitution. The article analyzes the meaning behind the meeting to discuss the shareholder exclusion on the limited liability companies and, on its conclusion, the new wording’s constitutionality. The present study was based on bibliographic research and deductive method to reach its conclusion.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.