Abstract

Modeling stochastic behavior of chemical reaction networks is an important endeavor in many aspects of chemistry and systems biology. The chemical master equation (CME) and the Gillespie algorithm (GA) are the two most fundamental approaches to such modeling; however, each of them has its own limitations: the GA may require long computing times, while the CME may demand unrealistic memory storage capacity. We propose a method that combines the CME and the GA that allows one to simulate stochastically a part of a reaction network. First, a reaction network is divided into two parts. The first part is simulated via the GA, while the solution of the CME for the second part is fed into the GA in order to update its propensities. The advantage of this method is that it avoids the need to solve the CME or stochastically simulate the entire network, which makes it highly efficient. One of its drawbacks, however, is that most of the information about the second part of the network is lost in the process. Therefore, this method is most useful when only partial information about a reaction network is needed. We tested this method against the GA on two systems of interest in biology - the gene switch and the Griffith model of a genetic oscillator—and have shown it to be highly accurate. Comparing this method to four different stochastic algorithms revealed it to be at least an order of magnitude faster than the fastest among them.

Highlights

  • In a network of chemical reactions, the molecular concentrations at any given time cannot be predicted with a certainty; they can only be anticipated with a certain probability

  • One can get a sense for the dynamics of this system by looking at the evolution of its averaged variables, S0, S1, S2, m and n, given by the set of ordinary differential equations (ODE)

  • It is clear that the chemical master equation (CME)-Gillespie algorithm (GA) is significantly more efficient than any of the other algorithms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In a network of chemical reactions, the molecular concentrations at any given time cannot be predicted with a certainty; they can only be anticipated with a certain probability. Attempting to do so, can more often than not be a frustrating exercise: except for a handful of simple cases, the CME cannot be solved analytically, and for a lot of interesting cases even a numerical solution can be near impossible to attain. One way around this obstacle was an algorithm proposed by Doob [1] and later presented and popularized by Gillespie [2]. The authors showed that the information stored in the CME can be PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0149909 March 1, 2016

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call