Abstract

The high productivity of a production process has a major impact on the reduction of the production cost and on a quick response to changing demands. Information about a failure-free machine operation time obtained in advance allows the users to plan preventive maintenance in order to keep the machine in a good operational condition. The introduction of maintenance work into a schedule reduces the frequency of unpredicted breaks caused by machine failures. It also results in higher productivity and in-time production. The foregoing of this constitutes the main idea of the predictive scheduling method proposed in the paper. Rescheduling of disrupted operations, with a minimal impact on the stability and robustness of a schedule, is the main idea of the reactive scheduling method proposed. The first objective of the paper is to present a hybrid multi-objective immune algorithm (H-MOIA) aided by heuristics: a minimal impact of disrupted operation on the schedule (MIDOS) for predictive scheduling and a minimal impact of rescheduled operation on the schedule (MIROS) for reactive scheduling. The second objective is to compare the H-MOIA with various methods for predictive and reactive scheduling. The H-MOIA + MIDOS is compared to two algorithms, identified in reference publications: (1) an algorithm based on priority rules: the least flexible job first (LFJ) and the longest processing time (LPT) (2) an Average Slack Method. The H-MOIA + MIROS is compared to: (1) an algorithm based on priority rules: the LFJ and LPT and (2) Shifted Gap-Reduction. This paper presents the research results and computer simulations.

Highlights

  • The term ’scheduling’ refers to the allocation of a set of jobs, materials, tools and workers to predefined number of machines in order to optimize one or more objective functions

  • The least flexible job first (LFJ)/longest processing time (LPT) is less effective than the hybrid multi-objective immune algorithm (H-MOIA) and the Average Slack Method (ASM) comparing results achieved for two scheduling problems, the flow shop and the job shop (Tables 6 and 10)

  • The first stage is used for the generation of the basic schedule, the second stage is used for predictive scheduling, whereas the third stage is used for reactive scheduling

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The term ’scheduling’ refers to the allocation of a set of jobs, materials, tools and workers to predefined number of machines in order to optimize one or more objective functions. The paper presents the hybrid multi-objective immune algorithm (H-MOIA) aided by heuristic: minimal impact of disrupted operation on the schedule (MIDOS) for predictive scheduling. The paper presents the hybrid multi-objective immune algorithm (H-MOIA) aided by heuristic: minimal impact of rescheduled operation on the schedule (MIROS) for reactive scheduling The advantage of this method is in introducing as few changes as possible after a disturbance in a schedule. Phenomena of an immune system, adopted in the H-MOIA, includes a pathogen representing a scalar objective function (1), an antibody corresponding to a solution of the problem—the schedule with the minimal value of the scalar objective function Priority rules such as the LPT (Longest Processing Times), RIPS (Random Insertion Permutation Scheme) and EDD (Earliest Due Date) aid the processes of searching for a good quality basic schedule. A reactive schedule (RS) is generated if the effect of a disruption is excessively large

Predictive scheduling methods
Reactive scheduling methods
Experimental study and results
The flow shop scheduling problem
The job shop scheduling problem
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call