Abstract

Abstract Background Environmental decisions can be complex because of the inherent trade-offs among environmental, social, ecological, and economic factors. This paper presents a novel hybrid fuzzy stochastic analytical hierarchy process (FSAHP) approach to aid decision making by incorporating fuzzy and stochastic uncertainty into the traditional analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A case study related to ballast water management is used to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach. Nine experts from government ministries and academic institutions are invited to evaluate five treatment technologies (i.e., heat treatment, ultraviolet, ozone, ultrasound, and biocide) based on a number of criteria such as efficacy, capital cost, and human risk. Results The experts’ preferences over the set of alternatives are represented as linguistic terms instead of numerical values. The beta-PERT distribution is adopted to approximate the probability density functions of the values of their inputs. Statistical analysis indicates that ultraviolet has the highest score (0.22–0.24) in most replications and its overlap with the second-best alternative is statistically negligible. Ozone, ultrasound, and heat treatment are mostly found as the second-, third-, and fourth-best alternatives with considerable overlaps that may be reduced if more experts are involved. Conclusions As compared with the traditional AHP, the proposed FSAHP approach can not only take into account linguistic information but also capture the uncertainty associated with insufficient information and biased opinions in group decision-making problems.

Highlights

  • Environmental decisions can be complex because of the inherent trade-offs among environmental, social, ecological, and economic factors

  • Li and Chen [35] developed a fuzzy-stochastic-interval linear programming (FSILP) approach for supporting municipal solid waste management by tackling uncertainties expressed in normal probability distributions, fuzzy membership functions and discrete intervals

  • Jing et al [21] further integrated the uniform distribution with interval judgment to a hybrid stochastic-interval analytic hierarchy process (SIAHP) framework for group decision making on wastewater reuse

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Environmental decisions can be complex because of the inherent trade-offs among environmental, social, ecological, and economic factors. This paper presents a novel hybrid fuzzy stochastic analytical hierarchy process (FSAHP) approach to aid decision making by incorporating fuzzy and stochastic uncertainty into the traditional analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Kornyshova and Salinesi [6] classified them into categories such as outranking methods, analytic hierarchy process, multiattribute utility theory, weighting methods, fuzzy methods, and multiobjective programming. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP), first proposed by Saaty [7], is one of the most widely used MCDM approaches. It structures the the AHP has been criticized for its inability to quantify the uncertainty associated with decision making [14]. Human experts tend to use linguistic terms (e.g., good, poor, excellent) to express their judgments which can not be handled effectively using crisp scales

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call