Abstract

To improve the modeling quality of pollutant transport in shallow waters, different reconstruction schemes have been proposed to better link the edge values to the centroid values of a pollutant concentration in finite-volume shallow water models: a scheme of higher (lower) order generally has a better (poorer) quantitative accuracy but lower (higher) computational efficiency. Here, a numerical comparative study of several classical schemes is first conducted under a variety of pollutant distribution conditions. The results reveal that, for the condition of relatively uniform pollutant distribution, the numerical accuracy of a lower-order scheme (such as the first-order scheme or the MUSCL scheme) may be similar to that of a higher-order scheme (such as the WENO scheme). The second-order derivative of the concentration, here termed the nonlinear indicator (NI), correlates well with the discrepancies between the numerical solutions and analytical solutions. A threshold value of approximately 10−7∼10−6 m-2 for the NI is identified, above which a higher-order scheme may be required. Based on this understanding, a hybrid first-order and WENO scheme is proposed. Numerical case studies show that the hybrid scheme can successfully combine the efficiency of the first-order scheme with the high accuracy of the WENO scheme for pollutant modeling.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.