Abstract

Sentiment analysis is a critical task of extracting subjective information from online text documents. Ensemble learning can be employed to obtain more robust classification schemes. However, most approaches in the field incorporated feature engineering to build efficient sentiment classifiers.The purpose of our research is to establish an effective sentiment classification scheme by pursuing the paradigm of ensemble pruning. Ensemble pruning is a crucial method to build classifier ensembles with high predictive accuracy and efficiency. Previous studies employed exponential search, randomized search, sequential search, ranking based pruning and clustering based pruning. However, there are tradeoffs in selecting the ensemble pruning methods. In this regard, hybrid ensemble pruning schemes can be more promising.In this study, we propose a hybrid ensemble pruning scheme based on clustering and randomized search for text sentiment classification. Furthermore, a consensus clustering scheme is presented to deal with the instability of clustering results. The classifiers of the ensemble are initially clustered into groups according to their predictive characteristics. Then, two classifiers from each cluster are selected as candidate classifiers based on their pairwise diversity. The search space of candidate classifiers is explored by the elitist Pareto-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm.For the evaluation task, the proposed scheme is tested on twelve balanced and unbalanced benchmark text classification tasks. In addition, the proposed approach is experimentally compared with three ensemble methods (AdaBoost, Bagging and Random Subspace) and three ensemble pruning algorithms (ensemble selection from libraries of models, Bagging ensemble selection and LibD3C algorithm). Results demonstrate that the consensus clustering and the elitist pareto-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm can be effectively used in ensemble pruning. The experimental analysis with conventional ensemble methods and pruning algorithms indicates the validity and effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.