Abstract

This paper presents a thorough overview of hydraulic stimulation techniques, conducted in laboratories. It further analyses field experiments and ongoing projects for geothermal energy production to investigate if the findings from the lab can be practically applied to the field. Stimulation techniques have been long used in the oil and gas industry as a means to increasing the rock permeability and consequently the reservoir’s fluid production rate. Among the different stimulation methods, hydraulic fracturing is known to be the most successful in creating new passageways in the formation. Nevertheless, the benefits of fracturing have been hindered by the handful of events in which poor planning had led to severe seismic activities. Therefore, across the globe, many efforts were dedicated to characterizing fracture creation and propagation in different rocks, not only to provide know-how for further and safer developments in the oil and gas front but also to adapt such findings to the ever-emerging field of geothermal energy recovery. In the course of this work, over 100 papers were studied. The papers included laboratory experiments on various rock types encountered in reservoirs, where parameters such as stress regime, fracture initiation pressure, formation breakdown pressure, volume, and types of fluid injected were monitored. To investigate whether or not such practices had been previously applied in geothermal energy production, a thorough study was also conducted on large-scale experimental setups constructed in the field as well as hydraulic fracturing procedures performed in operational projects, going back as far as a decade. The results show an agreement between laboratory experiments and field operations, yet naturally including individual results from cases where either the lab parameters or field characteristics were extraordinarily unique. Multiple cross-correlations were also performed between different key parameters that play a role in a fracturing process, providing trends that could be intra- or extrapolated for further research and planning. The novelty of this work is the comprehensive analysis of numerous research projects done around the world. As a result, this paper will not only be an informative and yet compacted source of information concerning previous projects, but it also points out the main factors and their relationships which need to be understood to guide a future project to success.

Highlights

  • Ever since the discovery of shale oil and gas, there had been considerable growth in the implementation of stimulation techniques, in particular, hydraulic fracturing

  • Numerous studies were undertaken all across the world, in locations with potentials for high-enthalpy geothermal energy recovery. Such efforts could be characterized into the following categories: Computer modeling and simulation, Laboratory experiments, Field experiments, Demonstration projects; This paper will review the results of these studies, as well as the operational projects, classify

  • A different work was described as testing of the mechanical impulse hydraulic fracturing method on samples of acrylic, concrete, granite, and limestone was performed under triaxial load and elevated temperature level [62], where fracturing fluids water, brine, oil, and epoxies were selected

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ever since the discovery of shale oil and gas, there had been considerable growth in the implementation of stimulation techniques, in particular, hydraulic fracturing. The high-temperature zones exist mainly in very deep layers of the earth’s crust, typically in crystalline rocks and close to the earth’s mantle Accessing these layers requires one or more wellbores drilled through hard rocks as well as a permeable reservoir into which water can be injected, allowed to flow through, heat up, and produced again back to the surface. Numerous studies were undertaken all across the world, in locations with potentials for high-enthalpy geothermal energy recovery Such efforts could be characterized into the following categories: Computer modeling and simulation, Laboratory experiments, Field experiments, Demonstration projects; This paper will review the results of these studies, as well as the operational projects, classify. The goal is to presents a thorough overview of the state of the art, as well as the global know-how and expertise, which can be useful for current and planned projects

Laboratory scaling laws and fracture propagation detection
Laboratory hydraulic fracturing tests
Conducted lab experiments based on rock type
Igneous rocks
Tests combining samples of different rock types
Field research
Collab – USA
FORGE Utah – USA
GTS – Switzerland
Field operation
Desert peak – USA
Raft river – USA
Newberry – USA
Rittershofen – France
Otaniemi – Finland
DEEPEGS – Iceland
Pohang – South Korea
Schneeberg – Germany
SHEGS – Hungary
Qiabuqia – China
DEEPEGS – France
BULG - Switzerland
Projects with potential for stimulation
United Downs – UK
Eden – UK
Mauerstetten – Germany
Comparison of lab and field observations
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.