Abstract
After the collapse of the “Atlantic Wall” and the breaking of the boundaries between continental and analytic philosophy, there has been a historical turn in analytic philosophy, and contrary to expectations of the emergence of post-analytic philosophy on the philosophical scene, neo-pragmatism took that place, although these terms indicate in a rough way the same phenomenon. This situation demonstrates the modern definition of analytical philosophy as a technique and toolkit rather than a set of problems that define a philosophical tradition. Neopragmatism, in turn, was more consistent with the maintenance of humanistic intellectual traditions, satisfying substantive needs, which by the beginning of the XXI century. come to the foregraund, pushing back the sophisticated logical toolkit and the elitist method, unsuitable for the mass consumer of philosophical knowledge that was formed during this period.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
