Abstract

BackgroundWe aim to evaluate the presence of histological artefacts in the surgical margins of human oral fibro-epithelial hyperplasias excised with lasers of different wavelengths, and also electrosurgical scalpel and cold scalpel. Moreover, we aim to determine if some of these instruments could impair the normal histological diagnosis of these lesions.Material and MethodsWe included 130 consecutive surgical samples of 80 females and 50 males (mean age of 53.82±16.55) with a histological diagnosis of an oral benign fibrous-epithelial hyperplasias. The samples were categorized into 6 groups according to the type of instrument used: CO2 laser group, diode laser group, Er:YAG laser group, Nd:YAG laser group, electrosurgical scalpel group and cold scalpel group. Histological instrument-induced changes were microscopic evaluated and related with clinical and pathological variables.ResultsThe instrument with highest tissue damage extension (TDE) was the electrosurgical scalpel (1002.2µm±434.92), followed by diode laser (913.73 µm±322.45), Nd:YAG (899.83µm±327.75), CO2 laser (538.37µm±170.50), Er:YAG laser (166.47µm±123.85), and at last with fewer alterations the cold scalpel group (2.36µm±7.27) (P< 0.001). The most regular incision was observed in CO2 laser group, followed by Er:YAG laser, Nd:YAG laser, electrosurgical scalpel and diode laser group with the less regular incision using cold scalpel as comparison (P< 0.001). A correlation was found between the incision score and TDE (P< 0.001). Regarding histological diagnosis, no case showed any limitation of diagnosis related with the use of any instrument evaluated.ConclusionsOur results suggest that lasers can be used for the excision of oral benign fibrous-epithelial hyperplasias, without hispathological diagnosis limitations, as long as the physical properties of each laser are known and respected. Er:YAG laser have shown to be a laser with few tissue damage extension and with good incision regularity, been a possible instrument of choice for the surgical removal of these lesions. Key words:CO2 laser, diode laser, Er:YAG laser, Nd:YAG laser, oral mucosa.

Highlights

  • Oral cavity includes a unique combination of several tissues that contributes to the existence of many physiological functions such fonation, chewing or breathing

  • Our results suggest that lasers can be used for the excision of oral benign fibrous-epithelial hyperplasias, without hispathological diagnosis limitations, as long as the physical properties of each laser are known and respected

  • On post hoc analysis of epithelial score the significant differences were obtained between cold blade vs Er:YAG laser (P < 0.001), cold blade vs CO2 laser (P < 0.001), cold blade vs Nd:YAG laser (P < 0.001), cold blade vs diode laser (P < 0.001), cold blade vs electrosurgical scalpel (P < 0.001), Er:YAG laser vs Nd:YAG laser (P < 0.001), Er:YAG laser vs diode laser P < 0.001), and Er:YAG laser vs electrosurgical scalpel (P = 0.012)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Oral cavity includes a unique combination of several tissues that contributes to the existence of many physiological functions such fonation, chewing or breathing. Reports of epithelial and connective tissue artefacts caused by lasers have been reported including nuclear changes such as hyperchromic nuclei, intracellular vacuolization, cell fusion, loss of cell attachment, carbonization and desiccation [8,10,13,14] They could lead to imprecise histological observations such as the existence of pseudodysplasic changes that could impair or at least interfere with histopathological diagnosis of oral soft tissue lesions [15,16,17]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microscopic morphological changes in the surgical margins of human oral fibro-epithelial hyperplasias excised with CO2, diode, Nd:YAG or Er:YAG lasers, electrosurgical scalpel and cold scalpel. We aim to evaluate the presence of histological artefacts in the surgical margins of human oral fibro-epithelial hyperplasias excised with lasers of different wavelengths, and electrosurgical scalpel and cold scalpel. No case showed any limitation of diagnosis related with the use of any instrument evaluated

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call