Abstract
The statistical bases for current models of RAID reliability are reviewed and a highly accurate alternative is provided and justified. This new model corrects statistical errors associated with the pervasive assumption that system (RAID group) times to failure follow a homogeneous Poisson process, and corrects errors associated with assuming the time-to-failure and time-to-restore distributions are exponentially distributed. Statistical justification for the new model uses theory for reliability of repairable systems. Four critical component distributions are developed from field data. These distributions are for times to catastrophic failure, reconstruction and restoration, read errors, and disk data scrubs. Model results have been verified and predict between 2 to 1,500 times as many double disk failures as estimates made using the mean time to data loss method. Model results are compared to system level field data for RAID group of 14 drives and show excellent correlation and greater accuracy than either MTTDL.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
