Abstract

As climate change takes hold in the $21^{st}$ century, it places an impetus to decarbonize the American Electric Power System with renewable energy resources. There is a broad technical consensus that these renewable energy resources cannot be integrated alone but rather require a host of profound changes in the electric grid’s architecture; including meshed distribution lines, and energy storage solutions. One question that arises is whether these three types of mitigation measures required by decarbonization will also serve as adaptation measures when the climate changes and extreme weather phenomena become more prevalent. Consequently, this paper presents a structural resilience analysis of the American electric power system that incrementally incorporates these architectural changes in the future. Building upon a preliminary study, the analysis draws on an emerging hetero-functional graph theory based upon the inter-connectedness of a system’s capabilities. The hetero-functional graph analysis confirms our formal graph understandings from network science in terms of cumulative degree distributions and traditional attack vulnerability measures. The paper goes on to show that hetero-functional graphs relative to formal graphs more precisely describe the changes in functionality associated with the addition of distributed generation and energy storage as the grid evolves to a decarbonized architecture. Finally, it demonstrates that the addition of all three types of mitigation measures enhance the grid’s structural resilience; even in the presence of disruptive random and targeted attacks. The paper concludes that there is no structural trade-off between grid sustainability and resilience enhancements and that these strategic goals can be pursued simultaneously.

Highlights

  • ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION this paper presents a structural resilience analysis of the American electric power system that incrementally incorporates these architectural changes in the future

  • The directed edges in the hetero-functional graph (HFG) indicate the logical sequences of these capabilities such that if one were to follow them a “story" of capabilities would emerge. (i.e. The water treatment facility treats water (ψ1) and the water pipeline transports the water from the water treatment facility to the house (ψ8))

  • A formal graph (FG) graph adjacency matrix is readily extracted from this GIS data and the methods section describes the construction of the associated HFG

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

System resilience has been quantitatively studied in terms of successive node or edge failures While such a simple graph model can address the resilience improvements caused by a migration towards meshed distribution networks, and the addition of new nodes that represent solar PV and energy storage facilities, it is ill-equipped to address the integration of such distributed energy resources on existing nodes as in the case of solar panels on rooftops and batteries at homes, substations, and centralized generators. In effect, such additions (as shown later) do not numerically change the formal graph, and have no effect on the value of the associated resilience measure.

BACKGROUND
DEGREE DISTRIBUTION BEHAVIOR
ADVANCING THE ELECTRIC GRID
IMPROVED ARCHITECTURES UNDER ATTACK
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call