Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs), including saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) or left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafts, are recently applied to treat coronary artery aneurysm (CAA). Surgical outcomes are considered to be related to surgical strategies (types of the bypass graft and whether CAA ligated or not) and the size of the CAA (usually characterized by diameter). However, the understanding of the relationship between the surgical outcomes and the abovementioned factors is limited. Previous studies related to CABG treatments have shown hemodynamic studies could help evaluate surgical outcomes through graft mass flow rate, wall shear stress (WSS), and oscillatory shear index (OSI). It is believed that the hemodynamic study of applying CABGs to CAA, which is not studied yet, could help us understand the different CABG surgeries. The aim of the study was to evaluate the hemodynamic differences among different surgical methods. To do this, eight three-dimensional models were constructed, representing application of SVGs and LIMA grafts to CAAs (whether ligated or not) with diameters two, three, and five times the normal diameter, to perform computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. The lumped-parameter model (LPM) was coupled to the boundary of the 3D models which increase the complexity of the simulation, but it can ensure the stability of the simulation boundary conditions. The results show that SVG (no matter whether ligated or not) hemodynamic characteristics are positive, with an average high graft mass flow rate of 70 ml/min, an average WSS of 0.479 Pa, and a low OSI of 0.001. LIMA with CAA ligation has the same characteristics with higher WSS (average 1.701 Pa). The hemodynamic characteristics of LIMA without CAA ligation are negative, including high reverse mass flow rate and high OSI (0.367). The results indicate that the surgical outcomes of LIMA with CAA ligation are likely to be the best among these models. The surgical outcomes of LIMA without CAA ligation seem to be undesirable due to the high reverse mass flow and high OSI. The CAA diameter may not have a significant effect on surgical outcomes.

Highlights

  • Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are cardiovascular disease, which is defined as dilatation of the coronary artery exceeding more than 50% of the reference vessel diameter, and the incidence rate is approximately 0.3–5.3% [1, 2]

  • In this finite element simulation, we evaluated some key hemodynamic parameters which could help evaluate surgery, including mass flow rate, wall shear stress (WSS), and oscillatory shear index (OSI) on the bypass graft

  • The hemodynamic differences between two different surgical methods and the effect of CAA diameter on the hemodynamics of different surgical methods were compared by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are cardiovascular disease, which is defined as dilatation of the coronary artery exceeding more than 50% of the reference vessel diameter, and the incidence rate is approximately 0.3–5.3% [1, 2]. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is usually selected to treat myocardial ischemia and complications caused by CAAs [4,5,6]. Ere are usually two different surgical options and an important parameter to be considered when implementing CABG applying to CAA. E different surgical options include the types of CABGs and whether the CAA is ligated or not. Saphenous vein grafts (SVG) and left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafts, harvested from the patients’ own body, are the main choice for the bypass graft of CABG surgery [12]. E CAA ligated or nonligated can cause different degrees of damage to blood vessels. Ligation is to cut off the original coronary arteries, which will cause huge structural damage to the cardiovascular system. E important parameter to be considered is the size of the CAA, which is usually characterized by diameter. Changes in the size of the CAA diameter could affect the complications, which means the surgical strategy may be affected

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.