Abstract

An enormous number of synthetic chemicals are incorporated in topical drugs, cosmetics and toiletries. These have the potential to cause irritant reactions when chronically applied to human skin. In predictive tests for assessing the irritancy potential of these chemicals, haired species, especially rabbits, guinea pigs and mice, have figured prominently. Customarily these tests, including the renowned Draize rabbit test, have entailed a single acute exposure or at most daily exposures over a few weeks. Estimation of inflammation and tissue injury in these models have relied on visual assessment. We submit that this approach is no longer acceptable. Visual assessments are unreliable. Reactions which are scored equivalently by the naked eye may differ strikingly when examined histologically. Moreover, tissue injury may be present in clinically normal skin. Short-term results, even when abetted by routine histological evaluations, cannot predict the degree of injury from long-term exposures. Cosmetics and toiletries, for example, are used daily for decades, often over most of the lifespan of persons who are well groomed. We present the hairless mouse as a convenient, reliable model for assessing the chronic toxicity of diverse chemicals. Histological examination enables a detailed description of the different tissue components which participate in the complex cascade of changes that comprise the inflammatory response.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.