Abstract

There has been increasing interest in the clinical and experimental use of memory functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). The 2017 American Academy of Neurology practice guidelines on the use of pre-surgical cognitive fMRI suggests that verbal memory fMRI could be used to lateralize memory functions in people with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE) and should be used to predict post-operative verbal memory outcome. There are however technical and methodological considerations, to optimize both the sensitivity and specificity of this imaging modality. Below we discuss these constraints and suggest recommendations to consider when designing a memory fMRI paradigm.

Highlights

  • The most important cognitive comorbidity of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE) is impairment in episodic memory

  • We aim to provide a guide for clinicians and researchers to design a memory functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) protocol for pre-surgical evaluation of memory in TLE

  • Sidhu et al later included a third response option (“Familiar”) to distinguish between the processes of recollection (“Remember” response) and familiarity (“Familiar” response). This type of paradigm provides information about the neural network associated with the encoding phase of memory, but not the network that is involved in the retrieval of mnemonic information

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The most important cognitive comorbidity of TLE is impairment in episodic memory. The hippocampus plays a major role in the generation and spread of temporal lobe seizures [1], and it is a critical structure serving long-term memory, including episodic memory [2]. A potential drawback with these paradigms relates to the fact that brain activation associated with the retrieval of studied items could reflect either familiarity or recollection processes This could lead to inaccurate conclusions regarding the differential role of sub-regions engaged within the MTL. Paradigms like the “Old/New” or “Remember/Know” can be adapted to either measure brain activity during the encoding phase or the retrieval phase of the memory process Sidhu et al later included a third response option (“Familiar”) to distinguish between the processes of recollection (“Remember” response) and familiarity (“Familiar” response) This type of paradigm provides information about the neural network associated with the encoding phase of memory, but not the network that is involved in the retrieval of mnemonic information. Obtaining robust hippocampal activation at the individual level has proven challenging across fMRI studies [63, 64], but a wider approach to memory mapping involving two memory phases (encoding and retrieval) may increase the sensitivity of this

Aim of the Protocol
CONCLUSIONS
ETHICS STATEMENT
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.