Abstract

Reviewing the existing literature is the preliminary stage of any research work. In the recent times, researchers have enormous sources to gather literature data related to their research topics, particularly from online journals, directories, and databases. The online sources such as Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science facilitate the researchers to know the updates and current state of the research domains. In traditional methods, a researcher had to collect the related research works, review them, code the information and present them in a narrative manner to specify the research gap in the existing studies. Presentation of a review of earlier studies is not a mere summary of description of earlier studies; it provides critical arguments on hypotheses to be considered and suitable methodology to investigate the topic, list of variables to be investigated, and so on. However, if one considers a huge volume of earlier studies, consolidating the information available in them is not an easy task. Critically exploring the hidden information and patterns in the existing studies, developing a visual/graphical representation of information from the data, and summarizing information through suitable metrics are gray areas in reviewing the existing studies. To overcome these issues, the study attempts to use principles from Graph Theory and proposes a new methodological approach to do the review of literature. Domains such as Sociology and Psychology have recognized the usefulness of Graph Theory, a branch of Mathematics and applied the principles to social network analysis (SNA). SNA adapts metrics such as degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, eigenvector centrality, cluster analysis, and modularity to identify the influential actors (nodes)/persons in the social networks. In this paper, these SNA metrics are compared with analyzing literature data to identify the influential variables in the literature, relationships among variables, and strength of relationships to develop suitable research problems, prioritizing the research problem, identification of variables for the study and to develop hypotheses. The sample literature articles are organized in a structured data and the structured data are visualized through a network graph. Furthermore, the network graph is analyzed by graph visualization and manipulation tools such as Gephi, UCINET, Graphviz, and NodeXL. Gephi 0.9 is used for network graph analysis and the graph theory metrics are investigated for the collected literature data.

Highlights

  • Reviewing earlier studies is a starting point of many research problems

  • The purpose of literature review can be classified into different perspectives: to examine old theories, to propose new ones or update the existing ones, and to justify where lack of evidence lies in relation to the particular research topic [3]

  • Development of various graphical visualization and manipulation tools is facilitated for literature review; to name two: bibliometric analysis is performed to find author affiliation and keyword statistics and network analysis to identify the relationship between the citation analysis and topical content

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reviewing earlier studies is a starting point of many research problems. An efficient reviewing process provides a foundation for advanced knowledge and theory development; it shows the fit of research areas in the existing body of knowledge and uncovered area where research is required [1]. Development of various graphical visualization and manipulation tools is facilitated for literature review; to name two: bibliometric analysis is performed to find author affiliation and keyword statistics and network analysis to identify the relationship between the citation analysis and topical content These procedures are helpful in developing an abstract research problem; these procedures fail to recognize patterns, insights into variables, and volume of support for existing dimensions. This is an undirected graph which means n1 is connected to three different nodes n2, n3, and n4 with three different relationships (edges) and e1, e2, and e3 without any arrowhead direction This network may be a friendship network, family network, coauthor network, literature variables network, and so on. Limitations of the study, direction for the future research, and concluding comments are placed at the end of this paper

Purpose of the Proposed Research Work
Methodology Results
SNA Metrics
Degree Centrality
Betweenness Centrality
Closeness Centrality
Eigenvector Centrality
Modularity
Cluster Coefficient
Applicability of Proposed Methodology for Literature Review
Paper 1
Metric Result and Discussion
Conclusions
Limitation and Future Direction

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.