A Good Normal Form for Relational Databases

Abstract

In the conceptual design of relational databases one of the main goals is to create a conceptual scheme, which minimize redundancies and eliminate deletion and addition anomalies, i.e. to create relation schemes in some good normal form. The study of relational databases has produced a host of normal forms: 2NF, 3NF, BCNF, Elementary-Key Normal Form, 4NF, Weak 4NF, PJ/NF, DK/NF, LTKNF, (3,3)NF, etc. There are two features which characterize these normal forms. First, they consider each relation separately. We believe that a normal form (which reflects the goodness of the conceptual design) should be related to the whole conceptual scheme. Second, the usefullness of all normal forms in relational database design have been based on the assumption that a data definition language (DDL) of a database management system (DBMS) is able to enforce key dependencies. However, different DDLs have different capabilities in defining constraints. In this paper we will discuss the design of conceptual relational schemes in general. We will also define a good normal form (GNF) which requires a minimally rich DDL; this normal form is based only on a primitive concept of constraints. We will not, however, discuss the normalization process itself – how one might, if possible, convert a relation scheme that is not in some normal form into a collection of relation schemes each of which is in that normal form.