Abstract
Abstract One common concern about strong environmental regulations is that they will detract from one area's “business climate,” limiting or driving away economic growth. Ironically, although the usual assumption is that businesses focus more narrowly on economic factors than do persons holding environmental concerns, it appears that little if any systematic attention has been devoted to the logic or the facts behind such “business climate” claims. The connections have generally been assumed, not demonstrated. Systematic, national‐level ratings of state “business climates” have now been available for more than a decade. Using the upper midwest state of Wisconsin as a reference point, this paper examines the predictive validity of three of the best‐known ratings. On average, “good” business climate ratings actually predicted worse economic outcomes; the states named as having “bad” business climates actually had better economic performance (growth in jobs and incomes) over subsequent 5‐ and 10‐year periods...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.