Abstract
As a heterogeneous malignancy, breast cancer (BRCA) shows high incidence and mortality. Discovering novel molecular markers and developing reliable prognostic models may improve the survival of BCRA. The RNA-seq data of BRCA patients were collected from the training set The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-BRCA and validation set GSE20685 in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. The "GSVA" R package was used to calculate the glycolysis score for each patient, based on which all the patients were divided into different glycolysis groups. The "limma" package was employed to perform differentially expression genes (DEGs) analysis. Key signature genes were selected by performing un/multivariate and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) C regression and used to develop a RiskScore model. The ESTIMATE and MCP-Counter algorithms were used for quantifying immune infiltration level. The functions of the genes were validated using Western blot, colony formation, transwell and wound-healing assay. The glycolysis score and prognostic analysis showed that high glycolysis score was related to tumorigenesis pathway and a poor prognosis in BRCA as overactive glycolysis inhibited the normal functions of immune cells. Subsequently, we screened five key prognostic genes using the LASSO Cox regression analysis and used them to establish a RiskScore with a high classification efficiency. Based on the results of the RiskScore, it was found that patients in the high-risk group had significantly unfavorable immune infiltration and prognostic outcomes. A nomogram integrating the RiskScore could well predict the prognosis for BRCA patients. Knockdown of PSCA suppressed cell proliferation, invasion and migration of BRCA cells. This study developed a glycolysis-related signature with five genes to distinguish between high-risk and low-risk BRCA patients. A nomogram developed on the basis of the RiskScore was reliable to predict BRCA survival. Our model provided clinical guidance for the treatment of BRCA patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: PeerJ
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.