Abstract

Purpose Assess the psychometric properties of the Life Back on Track (LBoT) measure, a novel self-reported single-item global measure of the trajectory of wellbeing after a transport accident. Materials and methods Evaluated the validity, reliability, sensitivity, and responsiveness using four survey waves (n = 1556 in wave 1), and two repeated cross-sectional surveys (n = 5238) and (n = 1964), of individuals injured in a transport accident in Victoria. Results There were statistically significant differences in the distribution of the LBoT scores by the respondent depression or pain scores, return to work status, financial ability to get by, ability to cope, and ability to bounce back (all p < 0.001). The LBoT measure was a statistically significant (p < 0.001) and reasonable predictor of future work status, and was moderately correlated (>0.67) with the EQ-5D-3L (concurrent validity). Retest reliability (ICC ≥0.76) and sensitivity (effect sizes >1.52) were supported, and it was moderately responsive to change (standard response mean statistics 0.4–0.8). Conclusions LBoT is a valid measure to track the individual’s trajectory of subjective wellbeing in the context of recovery after a trauma, and is potentially useful as an indicator to track the performance of commissioned providers, and to monitor or evaluate the value of service outcomes. Implications for Rehabilitation There is a demand to develop a simple metric to measure the impact of injury, the effectiveness of rehabilitation and the degree of recovery from trauma. Life Back on Track (LBoT) is a valid single-item measure to track an individual’s trajectory of subjective wellbeing after trauma. It has the potential to complement clinical measures where a routine collection of a simple measure is desirable. It is suitable as an indicator of service outcomes for organisations that commission services.

Highlights

  • Transport accidents remain a serious and complex public health issue globally (World Health Organization, 2018)

  • The data come from four waves of the Transport Accident Commission Longitudinal Study (n=1,556 in wave 1), and two repeated cross-sectional surveys– a Client Outcome Survey (n=5,238) and a Client Experience Survey (n=1,964) of individuals injured in a transport accident in Victoria

  • The Life Back on Track (LBoT) measure was found to have a conceptual basis of recovery towards a normal life with domains of independence, control, happiness, work, social life, pain, physical function, cognitive function, work and leisure activities, income, anxiety, and depression

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Transport accidents remain a serious and complex public health issue globally (World Health Organization, 2018). The burden has shifted from mortality towards injury and disability in the last 20 years. There is no agreement on how best to measure and track the overall quality of life (QoL) or subjective wellbeing of transport accident survivors (Rissanen, et al, 2017). There is, a clear demand to develop and use a valid single (non-monetary) metric to integrate changes in years of life with changes in disability, functionality, pain, and emotional distress to measure the impact of injury (Segui-Gomez & MacKenzie, 2003) and potentially other kinds of recovery from trauma. The study assessed the psychometric properties of the Life Back on Track (LBoT) measure, a new selfreported single-item global measure of the trajectory of wellbeing after a transport accident

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.