Abstract

The brain is a complex system, due to the heterogeneity of its structure, the diversity of the functions in which it participates and to its reciprocal relationships with the body and the environment. A systemic description of the brain is presented here, as a contribution to developing a brain theory and as a general framework where specific models in computational neuroscience can be integrated and associated with global information flows and cognitive functions. In an enactive view, this framework integrates the fundamental organization of the brain in sensorimotor loops with the internal and the external worlds, answering four fundamental questions (what, why, where and how). Our survival-oriented definition of behavior gives a prominent role to pavlovian and instrumental conditioning, augmented during phylogeny by the specific contribution of other kinds of learning, related to semantic memory in the posterior cortex, episodic memory in the hippocampus and working memory in the frontal cortex. This framework highlights that responses can be prepared in different ways, from pavlovian reflexes and habitual behavior to deliberations for goal-directed planning and reasoning, and explains that these different kinds of responses coexist, collaborate and compete for the control of behavior. It also lays emphasis on the fact that cognition can be described as a dynamical system of interacting memories, some acting to provide information to others, to replace them when they are not efficient enough, or to help for their improvement. Describing the brain as an architecture of learning systems has also strong implications in Machine Learning. Our biologically informed view of pavlovian and instrumental conditioning can be very precious to revisit classical Reinforcement Learning and provide a basis to ensure really autonomous learning.

Highlights

  • As stated by the French biologist and physician Henri Laborit [60], the motivation of living beings is being, i.e. maintaining their organic structure

  • The risk is to just study mechanisms apart from the rationale for their existence and to forget some of their fundamental characteristics and resources. In agreement with these considerations, we present here in a systemic view, a general framework of brain organization that has been elaborated from the analysis of the literature in cognitive, experimental and computational neuroscience

  • 5 Discussion In this paper, we have proposed a systemic description of the brain, as a contribution to a brain theory and as a general framework where specific models in computational neuroscience should be positioned before their development

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As stated by the French biologist and physician Henri Laborit [60], the motivation of living beings is being, i.e. maintaining their organic structure. 2, we specify the mentioned information flows and their links to the bodily dimension of cognition and to its emotional and motivational anchoring This leads to two important characteristics of the framework: the central role of Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning in the organization of behavior and the structuring role of four fundamental questions for defining the control of behavior. This process helps define elementary associations (the subtle combinations of cues, responses and contexts permitted by this circuitry that we call here rules) that minimize reward prediction errors [53] In addition to this fundamental role of dopamine in learning, another synergistic role of dopamine related to the control of performance participates in the gating mechanism, deciding for the maintenance or updating of information and will be described in Sect. The oculomotor loop [50] participates

Motivation
Associated mnemonic processes
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call