Abstract

Abstract The joint analysis of species’ evolutionary relatedness and their morphological evolution has offered much promise in understanding the processes that underpin the generation of biological diversity. Disparity through time (DTT) is a popular method that estimates the relative trait disparity within and between subclades, and compares this to the null hypothesis that trait values follow Brownian evolution along the time‐calibrated phylogenetic tree. To visualise the differences a confidence envelope is normally created by calculating, at every time point, the 97.5% minimum and 97.5% maximum disparity values from multiple simulations of the null model. The null hypothesis is rejected whenever the empirical DTT curve falls outside of this envelope, and these time periods may then be linked to events that may have sparked non‐random trait evolution. Here, simulated data are used to show this pointwise (ranking at each time point) method of envelope construction suffers from multiple testing and a poor, uncontrolled, false‐positive rate. As a consequence it cannot be recommended. Instead, each DTT curve can be given a single rank based upon their most extreme disparity value, relative to all other curves, and across all time points. Ordering curves this way leads to a test that avoids multiple testing, but still allows construction of a confidence envelope. The null hypothesis is rejected if the empirical DTT curve is ranked within the most extreme 5% ranked curves from the null model. Comparison of the rank envelope curve to the Morphological Disparity Index and Node Height tests shows it to have generally higher power to detect non‐Brownian trait evolution. An extension to allow simultaneous testing over multiple traits is also detailed. Overall the results suggest the new rank envelope test should be used in null model testing for DTT analyses. The rank envelope method can easily be adapted into recently developed posterior predictive simulation methods used in model selection analyses. More generally, the rank envelope test should be adopted whenever a null model produces a vector of correlated values and the user wants to determine where the empirical data are different to the null model.

Highlights

  • Understanding the joint temporal dynamics of taxonomic and phenotypic diversity can provide tremendous insights into evolutionary success and its relationship with ecological opportunity, selective pressures, constraints, biotic interactions and environmental conditions

  • Overall the results suggest the new rank envelope test should be used in null model testing for Disparity through time (DTT) analyses

  • The method currently implemented in geiger (v2.0.6) constructs a (100 − 2α)% confidence interval by excluding at each time point the α largest, and α smallest relative disparity values across the entire ensemble of DTT curves simulated under the null model

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Understanding the joint temporal dynamics of taxonomic and phenotypic diversity can provide tremendous insights into evolutionary success and its relationship with ecological opportunity, selective pressures, constraints, biotic interactions and environmental conditions. The current go-­to method is to simulate the null model n times (typically n > 1,000) and construct a (100 − 2α) confidence interval by excluding the α largest, and α smallest relative disparity values at each time point This method is referred to as the pointwise envelope method because the ordering of the curves occurs at each time point (Myllymaki, Mrkvicka, Grabarnik, Seijo, & Hahn, 2017). The visual/graphical interpretation of the DTT curve with an envelope test has extra appeal as it can be used to identify time points where the burst of non-­Brownian evolution occurred, enabling correlation with known evolutionary or environmental events that have triggered the burst. The rank envelope method will be shown to possess desirable type 1 error rates, and the best overall power to detect accelerating or decelerating rates of trait evolution

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call