Abstract
This contribution describes the state-of-the-art of historical seismology in the West Indies. An overview of the current parametric earthquake catalogues shows that historical earthquakes in the Greater and Lesser Antilles are less well known compared to those which affected the Venezuelan and Central American regions. Problems are still numerous and hard to solve for most former earthquakes, known from the mid 16th century on. The analysis of the catalogues shows that they are incomplete, and that their reliability also should be reconsidered. In recent years, the author has investigated locally stored primary historical sources as well as those in foreign archives and libraries, for instance in France and the United States. The paper deals with some case histories, the 1692, 1751, 1767, 1770, 1830, 1842, 1852, 1860, 1887, 1892 earthquakes in the Greater Antilles, the 1690, 1727, 1839, 1843, 1867 and 1897 in the Lesser Antilles. The examples highlight that there is still a need for further improving our knowledge on the historical seismicity of the West Indies, and that the investigation of the sources and repositories located outside this region is an open way to fruitfully approach this task.
Highlights
This contribution presents a short glimpse at the historical seismology of the West Indies
While parts of the Caribbean area participated in the renaissance of historical seismology, mostly Venezuela and Central America, parts of it escaped it, aside from sweeping catalogues, often inspired by former ones, and considering only publications founded on genuine research with a renewal of knowledge and/or interpretation
While specific problems arise in the West Indies their historical seismology illustrates in a sometimes extreme way more general issues
Summary
This contribution presents a short glimpse at the historical seismology of the West Indies (fig. 1). For instance, the famous earthquakes of 1751, 1770 (Haiti), 1852 (Cuban Oriente) and 1860 (Haiti) Such sequences deserve attention for a proper assessment of damage and intensity, and for a tentative discussion of the migration of epicentres in paleoseismic areas and for the knowledge of types of sequences possibly by comparison with instrumentally known sequences in the same areas. Whatsoever, catalogues and data banks should provide, besides other basic requirements, two major pieces of information First they should systematically give appraisals of reliability, for the location of epicentres, epicentral intensities, etc., from a judgement founded on an intimate knowledge of sources and their whereabouts.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
