Abstract
Efficient biodiversity conservation requires that limited resources be allocated in accordance with national responsibilities and priorities. Without appropriate computational tools, the process of determining these national responsibilities and conservation priorities is time intensive when considering many species across geographic scales. Here, we have developed a computational tool as a module for the ArcGIS geographic information system. The ArcGIS National Responsibility Assessment Tool (NRA-Tool) can be used to create hierarchical lists of national responsibilities and priorities for global species conservation. Our tool will allow conservationists to prioritize conservation efforts and to focus limited resources on relevant species and regions. We showcase our tool with data on 258 bird species and various biophysical regions, including Environmental Zones in 58 Asian countries and regions. Our tool provides a decision support system for conservation policy with attractive and easily interpretable visual outputs illustrating national responsibilities and priorities for species conservation. The graphical output allows for smooth integration into assessment reports, such as the European Article 17 report, the Living Planet Index report, or similar regional and global reports.
Highlights
State signatories to the Convention on Biological Diversity must define their own strategy to protect biodiversity, they must set their own priorities considering available resources
To avoid pitfalls caused by special constellations, we recommend using the global scale as a reference area in the following cases: (i) different borderlines for a subcontinent (e.g. Europe including parts of Turkey and Kazakhstan versus an extent based strictly on national borders) [43]), (ii) inclusion or exclusion of parts of a country that are on other continents, or (iii) countries divided by a sub-continental border (e.g. Russia)
When we used the Polygon Area-Approach (PA-A) instead of the Polygon CountApproach (PC-A), no country gained more than four additional species and the maximum number of species for which a country lost medium responsibility was 10
Summary
State signatories to the Convention on Biological Diversity must define their own strategy to protect biodiversity, they must set their own priorities considering available resources. There is still room to increase the global efficiency of biodiversity conservation by aligning national conservation. GIS-based policy support tool to determine national responsibilities for biodiversity conservation. The Global Environmental Stratification: A high-resolution bioclimate map of the world [dataset]. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world – A new map of life on Earth. The sources for ecoregions, technical descriptions, and digital data mentioned in this source are available from: https://www. Worldwildlife.org/pages/conservation-science-dataand-tools IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org/ resources/spatial-data-download IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources).
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Priorities For Species Conservation
National Responsibilities
National Priorities
Priorities For Biodiversity Conservation
Priorities For Conservation
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Jan 1, 2020
Environment, Development and Sustainability
Jun 21, 2017
Asian Journal of Conservation Biology
Jan 1, 2021
Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity
Mar 26, 2021
Conservation Biology
Jun 1, 2008
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
Jan 1, 2021
Systematics and Biodiversity
Jan 2, 2018
Biological Conservation
Jan 1, 1992
Apr 1, 2011
Journal of Environmental Management
Apr 1, 2023
Global Ecology and Conservation
Apr 1, 2018
Biological Conservation
Nov 1, 2015
Biogeographia – The Journal of Integrative Biogeography
Jan 1, 2004
The American Midland Naturalist
Jul 13, 2015
PLOS ONE
PLOS ONE
Nov 22, 2023
PLOS ONE
Nov 22, 2023
PLOS ONE
Nov 22, 2023
PLOS ONE
Nov 22, 2023
PLOS ONE
Nov 22, 2023
PLOS ONE
Nov 22, 2023
PLOS ONE
Nov 22, 2023
PLOS ONE
Nov 22, 2023
PLOS ONE
Nov 22, 2023
PLOS ONE
Nov 22, 2023