Abstract

The SNARC (Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes) effect (i.e., a tendency to associate small/large magnitude numbers with the left/right hand side) is prevalent across the whole lifespan. Because the ability to relate numbers to space has been viewed as a cornerstone in the development of mathematical skills, the relationship between the SNARC effect and math skills has been frequently examined. The results remain largely inconsistent. Studies testing groups of people with very low or very high skill levels in math sometimes found relationships between SNARC and math skills. So far, however, studies testing such extreme math skills level groups were mostly investigating the SNARC effect in individuals revealing math difficulties. Groups with above average math skills remain understudied, especially in regard to children. Here, we investigate the SNARC effect in gifted children, as compared to normally developing children (overall n = 165). Frequentist and Bayesian analysis suggested that the groups did not differ from each other in the SNARC effect. These results are the first to provide evidence for the SNARC effect in a relatively large sample of gifted (and mathematically highly skilled) children. In sum, our study provides another piece of evidence for no direct link between the SNARC effect and mathematical ability in childhood.

Highlights

  • Spatial–numerical associations and the SpatialNumerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effectFrom behavioural indexes to neural signatures, a large body of evidence shows bidirectional links between quantity/number processing and space (Cipora, Schroeder, Soltanlou, &10 Siegler Center for Innovative Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China11 Centre for Mathematical Cognition, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE 3TU, UK1 3 Vol.:(0123456789)Psychological Research (2021) 85:1645–1661Nuerk, 2018a; Dehaene, Bossini, & Giraux, 1993; Galton, 1880)

  • A robust SNARC effect was observed at the whole sample level

  • There were no significant differences in the SNARC effect between gifted children and the controls, no matter which additional criteria were used for group sampling

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spatial–numerical associations and the SNARC effectFrom behavioural indexes to neural signatures, a large body of evidence shows bidirectional links between quantity/number processing and space (Cipora, Schroeder, Soltanlou, &10 Siegler Center for Innovative Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China11 Centre for Mathematical Cognition, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE 3TU, UK1 3 Vol.:(0123456789)Psychological Research (2021) 85:1645–1661Nuerk, 2018a; Dehaene, Bossini, & Giraux, 1993; Galton, 1880). The SNARC effect can be observed in multiple tasks (e.g., parity judgment, magnitude classification, and phoneme monitoring). It is present irrespective of number presentation format (e.g., Arabic, number words, auditory numbers, dice patterns, nonsymbolic numbers, and numbers presented in a tactile format) and response mode (bi- and uni-manual, pointing, bipedal, and eye movements; see Nemeh, Humberstone, Yates, & Reeve, 2018; Patro, & Shaki, 2016a, b for effects in non-symbolic numbers; Wood, Willmes, Nuerk, & Fischer, 2008 for a meta-analysis; Fischer & Shaki, 2014 for a review)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call