Abstract

Abstract. Satellite-based cloud, aerosol, and trace-gas retrievals from ultraviolet (UV) and visible (Vis) wavelengths depend on the accurate representation of surface reflectivity. Current UV and Vis retrieval algorithms typically use surface reflectivity climatologies that do not account for variation in satellite viewing geometry or surface roughness. The concept of geometry-dependent surface Lambertian-equivalent reflectivity (GLER) is implemented for water surfaces to account for surface anisotropy using a Case 1 water optical model and the Cox–Munk slope distribution for ocean surface roughness. GLER is compared with Lambertian-Equivalent reflectivity (LER) derived from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) for clear scenes at 354, 388, 440, and 466 nm. We show that GLER compares well with the measured LER data over the open ocean and captures the directionality effects not accounted for in climatological LER databases. Small biases are seen when GLER and the OMI-derived LER are compared. GLER is biased low by up to 0.01–0.02 at Vis wavelengths and biased high by around 0.01 in the UV, particularly at 354 nm. Our evaluation shows that GLER is an improvement upon climatological LER databases as it compares well with OMI measurements and captures the directionality effects of surface reflectance.

Highlights

  • Satellite retrievals of clouds, aerosols, and trace gases rely on the accurate representation of surface reflectivity

  • Our evaluation shows that geometry-dependent surface Lambertian-equivalent reflectivity (GLER) is an improvement upon climatological LambertianEquivalent reflectivity (LER) databases as it compares well with Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) measurements and captures the directionality effects of surface reflectance

  • Previous work Qin et al (2019) introduced the GLER product for land surfaces based on bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) input from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aerosols, and trace gases rely on the accurate representation of surface reflectivity. Whereas the land product described in Qin et al (2019) used a model of BRDF with input from MODIS, GLER for ocean scenes is produced solely by modeling of waterleaving radiance and surface reflection. These surfaceleaving radiance contributions are geometry-dependent, and the anisotropic nature of light backscattered by the ocean has been studied in many papers (see, e.g., Gordon , 1989; Morel and Gentili, 1991, 1993, 1996; Park and Ruddick, 2005; Lee et al, 2013). PACE’s spectral coverage from the UVA to green wavelength region and in the red to near-infrared will enable unparalleled evaluation of ocean ecosystem properties in optically complex waters and in regions of increasing eutrophication (Cetinic et al, 2018)

VLIDORT radiative transfer model
Water-leaving radiance implementation
Cox–Munk BRDF implementation
Ancillary data for water model
Calculation of LER and GLER
OMI data and selection criteria
Global comparison of GLER and OMI-derived LER
Angular behavior of GLER
Simulating GLER with aerosols
Interannual variability of LER
Sensitivity to chlorophyll and wind speed
Additional sources of uncertainty
Conclusion
Water-leaving radiance model
Ocean-optics model
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call